[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Publication Ethics::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
ISSN
p-ISSN: 2645-8233
e-ISSN: 2645-5943
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Summer ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
National Emergency Management Organization: A Comparative Analysis
Hamidreza Khankeh , Shokoufeh Ahmadi , Mehrdad Farrokhi , Seyed Amirhossein Garakani , Ali Nasiri , Esmaeil Motlagh , Jalil Arab Kheradmand , Elham Ghanaatpisheh
Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (7 Views)
Background: The increasing frequency of disasters in recent decades poses serious threats to sustainable development and critical infrastructure. This study was conducted to develop an evidence-informed structural model for establishing the "National Emergency Management Agency" under the Presidency of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Methods: Utilizing a narrative review and comparative analysis, institutional models of selected countries (Germany, Japan, Turkey, and the United States) were examined to extract core components, including governance structures, statutory authorities, coordination mechanisms, and operational functions for national contextualization.
Results: Effective disaster governance systems rely on strong statutory authority, transparent institutional mandates, and seamless intersectoral coordination across the full disaster risk management cycle. Accordingly, a hybrid institutional model is proposed that combines centralized national strategic command with specialized technical directorates (e.g., early warning, research, and community participation) alongside decentralized subnational operational integration.
Conclusion: Institutionalizing disaster management at the vice-presidential level offers a transformative shift in national risk governance. The sustained success of this matrix structure requires phased implementation, dedicated legal and financial support, robust stakeholder engagement, and regular evidence-based revisions driven by lessons learned.
Keywords: Disaster Planning, Risk Management, Public Policy
Full-Text [PDF 1195 kb]   (5 Downloads)    
Letter: Narrative | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/06/15 | Accepted: 2026/07/31 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/10/4
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
نشريه فرهنگ و ارتقاء سلامت Iranian Journal of Culture and Health Promotion
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.18 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4774