[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Publication Ethics::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
ISSN
p-ISSN: 2645-8233
e-ISSN: 2645-5943
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Spring ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Analyzing the Performance of Examination Boards, Evaluating and Planning Basic Medical Sciences
Masoumeh Jorjani , Matin Baghani , Leila Doshmangir
Abstract:   (2 Views)
Background: Examination and evaluation boards in the basic medical sciences constitute a central component of educational governance within the national medical education system. Despite their formal policy-making and supervisory roles, structural and functional challenges limit their effectiveness. This study aimed to conduct a policy analysis of the performance of these boards and propose strategies to strengthen their governance role.
Methods: A mixed-method policy analysis approach was employed. Relevant upstream documents and bylaws were reviewed, followed by two rounds of structured surveys among board secretaries and members. The questionnaire addressed three performance domains: policy-making and planning, supervision and evaluation, and examination management. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
Results: Major challenges included unclear legal positioning, limited authority, restricted data access, absence of a structured accreditation system, weaknesses in examination standardization, and non-transparent member selection processes. Mean importance scores (out of 5) were 3.51 for policy-making and supervision and 2.89 for examination management. Proposed strategies included redefining legal mandates, developing a national accreditation framework, establishing a secure national question bank, standardizing member selection procedures, and strengthening information infrastructures.
Conclusion: The governance role of basic medical sciences boards requires structural and policy redesign. Clarifying legal authority, strengthening data-driven mechanisms, and enhancing accreditation and assessment standards may substantially improve their effectiveness in educational governance.
Keywords: Credentialing, Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation, Medicine, Specialty Boards
Full-Text [PDF 215 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Letter: Original Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/01/3 | Accepted: 2026/04/23 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/06/26
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
نشريه فرهنگ و ارتقاء سلامت Iranian Journal of Culture and Health Promotion
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4745