[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Publication Ethics::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
ISSN
p-ISSN: 2645-8233
e-ISSN: 2645-5943
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Spring ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Selection of Presidents of Medical Universities in Iran: Challenges and Policy Optimization Strategies
Leila Doshmagir , Hosein Ebrahimipour , Neda Kabiri , Mohammadhossein Somi , Amirhossein Takian , Sajad Lak , Omid Barati , Mohammadreza Amiresmaili , MohammadJavad Kabir , Mohammad Bazyar , Ali Akbari Sari
of Health Policy, Research Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (2 Views)
Background: The role of presidents in medical universities is critical for effective governance of health higher education. In Iran, however, the selection and appointment process has long faced challenges, including centralized decision-making, political considerations, and a lack of transparency in competency criteria. This manuscript aims to provide evidence-informed policy options and recommendations to reform the process.
Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach. First, a scoping review and a review of official documents were conducted. Then, 38 semi-structured interviews were carried out with key stakeholders, including current and former university presidents, Ministry of Health managers, faculty members, and policymakers. The data were analyzed using a framework analysis approach based on university governance and leadership competency models. Finally, aexpert panel session was held to develop policy options and considerations.
Results: Based on the findings, four main policy options were identified: maintaining the current system with minor reforms; establishing independent selection committees within each university; creating a national competency evaluation system; and delegating appointment authority to university boards of trustees. These options reflect varying degrees of decentralization, stakeholder engagement, and transparency, providing a framework for evidence-based policy interventions.
Conclusion: Redesigning the selection process based on meritocracy, transparency, and accountability is essential to improve the efficiency of health higher education in Iran. Implementing a national competency evaluation system and strengthening the role of boards of trustees can promote university autonomy and enhance governance in the health sector.
Keywords: Academic Medical Centers, GraduateEducation, Health Policy, Universities
Full-Text [PDF 734 kb]   (2 Downloads)    
Letter: Original Article | Subject: General
Received: 2025/11/12 | Accepted: 2026/05/25 | ePublished ahead of print: 2026/06/26
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
نشريه فرهنگ و ارتقاء سلامت Iranian Journal of Culture and Health Promotion
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4745